We are looking into implementing the draft IPv6 MIBs in the near future and
wondered about the current state of the drafts
- I noticed that there is no current Compliance statement
(ipv6Compliance??) in draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2011-update-00.txt. Will
this be updated soon?
- On the IPv6 MIB Design Team site, it appears that the
draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2012-update-00.txt and
draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2013-update-00.txt drafts have been
updated to remove some of the IP address type MIB objects (e.g.
tcpConnectionRemAddrType). Is this going to be applied to any of the
other MIB
drafts?
I also had a question about the InetAddressType TC in
draft-ietf-ops-rfc2851-update-05.txt. If I want to represent a global
IPv4-mapped IPv6 address with this textual convention, do I use a value of
ipv4(1) and set the corresponding InetAddress object to the IPv4 portion of
the IPv4-mapped address?
Thanks,
Kristine Adamson
IBM Communications Server for MVS: TCP/IP Development
Internet e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
