Erik, Erik Nordmark wrote: > One of my comments/questions in the first mail (which you passed to Brian > as an editorial one) was the issue of what aspects of the IPv4 stuff we > need and need not carry forward to IPv6. > > Clearly(?) the documents remove the need for MASC for IPv6. Is that all? > Will uni-based have any effect on MBGP and BGMP? > (I can't find an BGMP draft to even have a peek.)
The text in the draft will be changed to point out how uni-based mcast removes the need for inter-domain mcast allocation protocols. From my point of view, I don't see them really affecting MBGP or BGMP. From some discussions I have had with Dave, uni-based mcast MAY help make BGMP simpler... > > These questions might seem na�ve to you, but I suspect there are implementors > and operators that might have the same questions. No argument there. I am trying to find some time this week to make some updates to these docs so that we can keep them moving. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
