In your previous mail you wrote: some newbie questions: has anybody an idea if ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling works with normal access => this works well
points and in this context mobile ipv6 ? when packets are encapsulated in ipv4 it should.... theoretically. => in the context of mobility the best is to change the end of the IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel. This is transparent (i.e. you get mobility for free if you consider the whole IPv4 as a single IPv6 subnet). what about firewalls ? when tunneling ipv6 packets in an encapsulated ipv4 there should not be a problem, right ? => firewalls have the choice between: - to be fooled (the usual answer but this has some drawbacks) - to block everything (the stupid answer to the previous proposal) - to be smart, i.e. to inspect the IPv6 payload (of course the firewall has to support IPv6 too). maybe anybody has already some experience with wlan and ipv6. => IETF meetings use wireless LAN with a far from zero part in IPv6 without reported trouble. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
