http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial

C@t-32-BitOID:UnirVerse0QQQQGGGWWWXXXXX32-Bit Managed Address0000000000000000

Jim Fleming
http://www.ddj.com/articles/search/search.cgi?q=fleming
Oct93: The C+@ Programming Language 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: Request to Advance "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture"


> Erik, Thomas,
> 
> The chairs of the IP Next Generation working group, on behalf of the 
> working group, request that the following document be published as an Draft 
> Standard:
> 
> Title : IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
> Author(s) : B. Hinden, S. Deering
> Filename : draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-07.txt
> Pages : 27
> Date : 27-Nov-01
> 
> A working group last call for this document was completed on August 31, 
> 2001.  The -07 version of the draft resolves issues raised during the 
> working group last call and subsequent discussion.  A summary of the 
> comments received on the mailing list and their disposition is attached.
> 
> This document will obsolete RFC2373.  Changes from RFC2373 are listed in 
> Appendix B.
> 
> Bob Hinden / Steve Deering
> IPng Working Group Co-Chairs
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> COMMENT 1: Suggestion that it isn't good practice to talk about assigning 
> multicast address to an interface because it may confuse people and they 
> might be assigned directly to interfaces (e.g., via ifconfig command).
> 
> Text will be changed to clarify this issue.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 2: Questioned whether the IPv6 addresses with embedded IPv4 address 
> should be included in the document.
> 
> This was discussed at the interim meeting in Seattle and there was a 
> consensus to keep the mapped and compatible address in this 
> document.  Other types of transition addresses can be defined in other 
> documents.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 3: Suggestion that the anycast usage scenarios in the document are 
> very router centric and restrictions for router only usage be eased.
> 
> The current text will be revised to clarify that other anycast usage is 
> possible, but that new uses need to be specified.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 4: Suggestion that there be more clarification on the differences 
> between interface, link, and node in section 2.7 on multicast addresses.
> 
> Will add a summary description of the multicast scope values to the document.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 5: Questioned the removal of the format prefix (FP) and detailed FP 
> table, and instead only listing the exceptions to global unicast.
> 
> This issue was discussed on the mailing list and there was a consensus that 
> the current text is appropriate.  The resulting behavior of treating the 
> address space as global unicast, except for the listed exceptions, is correct.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 6: Suggestion to reserve some part of the IPv6 and have it's usage 
> be unspecified.
> 
> The discussion on the mailing concluded was this was not a good idea.  Past 
> experience with IPv4 indicated that it becomes very hard to utilize 
> "unspecified" address space in the future.
> 
> 
> COMMENT 7: Suggestion to move IANA considerations to a numbered section 
> instead of an appendix to make clearer it is normative.
> 
> Document will be updated to make the IANA consideration a numbered section.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to