Is this draft going to RFC status anytime soon? A lot of the basic behavior has changed between versions 02 and 03.
Would you say that version 03 is a fairly stabilized draft? Thanks, Lilian On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] 神明達哉 wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:21 -0500, > >>>>> Vladislav Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > So far, all my attempts to see this draft resulted in a "This > > draft has been deleted" message. > > > Did they new draft get submitted? > > Since the file of the URL does not seem to have been updated and I've > got a couple of questions about the latest version, I've put the > version that I submitted at the following URL: > > http://www.kame.net/~jinmei/draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2292bis-03.txt > > Please refer to this version until the official file is ready. > > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > _____________________________________________________________________ Lilian Fernandes AIX TCP/IP Development - IBM Austin Tel: 512-838-7966 Fax: 512-838-3509 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
