>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:14:24 -0500,
>>>>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I'd also like to know the current policy on this. The current status
>> is really confusing and can be a serious barrier to deploy IPv6.
>>
>> Honestly, if we are allowed to live with the current spec
>> (i.e. ip6.int. with the nibble format), I'll be really happy.
>> However, the transition to ip6.arpa is inevitable, we should be ready
>> for this as soon as possible, both in operation and in implementation.
> See RFC 3152, aka BCP 49.
I should have been clearer in the previous message...I know the RFC,
so my question is
does the RFC force us to obsolete ip6.arpa and migrate to ip6.arpa.?
and
is this the only way to go?
I'm not making an objection, I'm just asking. If the answer is yes,
I'm just okay with it.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
