% I'd also like to know the current policy on this. The current status % is really confusing and can be a serious barrier to deploy IPv6. % % Honestly, if we are allowed to live with the current spec % (i.e. ip6.int. with the nibble format), I'll be really happy. % However, the transition to ip6.arpa is inevitable, we should be ready % for this as soon as possible, both in operation and in implementation. % % JINMEI, Tatuya % Communication Platform Lab. % Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. % [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IETF policy is clear. ip6.arpa. It is also true that this policy was not based on any technical grounds. That said, the IETF has also depricated RIP. And there are still some questions about the bitstring format vs nibble format. So I intend to continue to use the proven format for now, at least until there are strong technical reasons to migrate. -- --bill -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
