This may help...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/

The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16....One Better !!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Damien Mascr�" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 4:12 PM
Subject: RE: "one true protocol"


> Don't forget that the low 8 bytes are not always
> ramdomly choosed and that having a rigid format
> for the packet is cute because the routers
> can handle the packets more faster, and so,
> it results in an increased bandwidth....
>
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Jim Fleming
> > Envoy� : lundi 3 d�cembre 2001 15:40
> > � : Brian E Carpenter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : Re: "one true protocol"
> >
> >
> > When you design protocols with 128 bit address fields, and then you
> > proceed to place non-routable, random numbers, in the right-most 64 bits
> > of each field, that results in 16 bytes of the 40 byte header
> > being wasted.
> > Those wasted bytes help to slow networks down and increase the need
> > for bandwidth. Such protocols will not likely be desired by people who
> > pay for bandwidth and people who like performance computing. While
> > such designs might be interesting academic exercises, and might be useful
> > in landing large government grants based on some artificial need for more
> > bandwidth, they are not considered engineering progress for the commercial
> > sector which builds networks that real people use in everyday
> > life, especially
> > in the United States of America.
> >
> > Jim Fleming
> > http://www.IPv8.info
> > IPv16....One Better !!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: "one true protocol"
> >
> >
> > > Yes, it is really slow to filter out stuff with the string "Jim Fleming"
> > > in the message body.
> > >
> > >    Brian
> > >
> > > Pekka Savola wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Please keep Jim Fleming in Cc: in threads initiated by Mr.
> > Fleming.  That
> > > > way our filters have better chance of "storing" these threads to where
> > > > they belong to.
> > > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to