Francis Dupont wrote: > > In your previous mail you wrote: > > It frustrated me a great deal that IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling with the same > protocol number 41 could be used for various things: > > 1. configured tunneling > > 2. automatic tunneling > 2.1 automatic tunneling with compatible addresses > 2.2 6to4 > 2.3 ISATAP > (more to come?) > > => oh, you forgot 6over4 ! > In any case, I think the reusability of type 41 is a feature, not a bug. It means we only have to persuade ISPs and corporate security people to open up one IPv4 protocol type to enable all forms of 6in4 tunnels.
Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
