[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > Francis, > > => I disagree: if the end node is too dumb to set itself the label > > (i.e. just uses in any case the zero value) and the first router > > for instance sets the label when needed then the zero value should > > not be immutable. I don't use dumb hosts (:-) but it seems > > this kind of > > things already commonly happens for RSVP in the real world so > > we should > > keep the door open... So I fully share Robert Elz's opinion. > > It was your input on this list that prompted us to put that option in the > draft. However, in the meeting we discussed the topic, and my perception was > that the room did not want to have this (the possibility for a router to > change the value from zero to non-zero). I know that you disagree with this. > Seems that we need to ask for WG opinions on this. I prefer not to endorse this kind of kludge, but as long as we don't change AH, it has little practical importance what we write in the document.
Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
