>>>> I do not believe that there is currently any way to deal with the >>>> *business* and *operational* issues of asking some remote ISP >>>> to provide QoS service for you in any sort of scalable way >>> Fine, but that's completely orthogonal to whether the flow label is >>> a good idea or not. >> we don't care that no one can operationally use it. if it might sell >> one more router, let's kludge up the net a bit more. > Oh, please. There is a very straighforward tweak to RSVP to support > this
i anxiously await a description the tweak which will provide "any way to deal with the *business* and *operational* issues of asking some remote ISP to provide QoS service for you in any sort of scalable way." randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
