In your previous mail you wrote:
Does anyone know if node mobility was a requirement for IPng during the
debates among the proposals?
=> I believe it was but which kind of mobility? At least the current
Mobile IPv4 situation, i.e. bidirectional tunnel between the mobile node
and its home agent.
If so was SIPP supposed to rely on MIPv6 to fullfill this requirement or are
these really disjunct with MIPv6 being an add on.
=> I don't believe for SIPP but PIP has some support for mobility
(look at the "Pip Near-term Arch" document section 14 "Host Mobility",
some of us preciously kept some copies of it).
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
