We are looking into implementing the draft IPv6 MIBs in the near future and had questions about the new drafts:
- - I noticed that there is no current Compliance statement (ipv6Compliance??) in draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2011-update-00.txt. Will this be updated soon?
- In the new RFC2013, there is a udpListenerTable and a udpConnectionTable. In our implementation, a UDP Listener can transition from the unconnected to the connected state, but not back again. The Listener can also change which Remote IP address/port it is connected to. When a Listener is in the connected state, would it be represented in both tables? Or should a Listener only ever be represented in one of these tables?
Thanks!
Kristine Adamson
IBM Communications Server for MVS: TCP/IP Development
Internet e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
