>> Pekka Savola wrote: >> I'm broadening the topic to include all kinds of home users, e.g. >> xDSL, Cable etc. in addition to dial-in.
> Tony Hain wrote: > No problem as the actual implementation at the consumer end is probably > similar. There will be some device between the provider network and the > consumer network, be that dial or always-on. The device needs either a > /48 so it can provide subnet based routing, or a /64 so it can provide > a bridged subnet capability. I concur with Tony. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
