In your previous mail you wrote: I don't share you pessimism. => I'd prefer to be wrong...
I think the claim that there are only two types of CNs that matter for mobile IPv6 (Web servers and mobile terminals) is a bit odd. => this is not my claim but this is clearly the vision of the Internet by many players in Europe (worse in France where the Internet is the super Minitel, brrr...) That is similar to saying that since most of the traffic on the internet is http why don't be build an http network instead of an IP network? => Brian Carpenter argues this can become the future of the Internet. Of course we don't want that, but remember I've begun by "I am pessimistic" and there is somthing named SOAP... The point is that the value of the Internet comes from service/application independence - people can build new services and applications and have them run on the Internet today - no need to upgrade things in the middle to deploy new things. => you don't need to convince me and I'm afraid the folks we should convince don't read these lists. So building a http + voip network is the wrong thing to do and => if you replace http by WAP (not an improvement) this is exactly what they are trying to do (I don't add a smile because this is *not* funny). the above statement sounds like it would be the right approach which is why I disagree with it rather strongly. => there is what we'd like and there is what it is (look better in French)... Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
