In your previous mail you wrote: Tony, > De: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > The TLA/NLA rules are obsolete, as the RIRs are managing the space > without the TLA/NLA designations. See > draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-07.txt as a replacement for RFC 2374. draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-07.txt quotes RFC 2374 in section 4. IANA considerations: INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 ADDRESS SPACE Global Unicast 001 1/8 [RFC2374] (However, [RFC2374] is not included in the references) So, is there a new version for RFC 2374 that deprecates TLA/NLA asignment rules or is just that reality is not following the RFCs? => this was already discussed in the list: TLA/NLA should not be referenced (i.e. constrain) by the (future) DS document about addressing architecture.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
