On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for your replies. I do have 1 question with respect to the > pseudo-interfaces. For **configured** tunnels the ifIndex for the > corresponding pseudo interface is created as a by-product of row > creation in the tunnelConfigTable (RFC 2667). However, for automatic > tunnels no row is created in the tunnelConfigTable. But what is then the > trigger to create an ifIndex for a pseudo interface for an **automatic** > tunnel? > > Thanks for any clarifications you can provide.
Well, if no such thing is created, I think that's an implementation issue. Anyway, RFC3056 is more of a ngtrans than ipng. I don't see why you couldn't create an entry for automatic tunnels, the only thing to watch out for is that tunnelConfigRemoteAddress is zero. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
