Hi Hesham,

Thanks for the quick response.

>=> Then let's begin the discussions. The only reason
>for standardising the draft in the IPv6 WG was to make
>sure that we're doing the right thing. Otherwise an 
>informational RFC wouldn't have to go through the
>IPv6 WG or could have been replaced by a 3GPP spec.
>But since the competence is here, it is crucial
>that we get feedback.

That sounds good.  Let's begin the discussions...

I'll send separate threads for each issue.

>   > It is not my impression that the WG has reached consensus on some
>   > of the issues raised in this document, specifically:
>   > 
>   >          - Forbidding the use of DAD on some links
>
>=> DAD is not needed if address duplication is not
>possible. Since each terminal gets a unique
>/64 (as per the advice draft), and since all terminals
>are on p2p links, DAD would be a waste of BW.
>But please have a closer look and let us know 
>if something was missed. 

Address duplication is possible on point-to-point links, because
one end may choose an address that is already in use by the other
end.  I don't think that this is very likely, but it is possible.

However, making DAD optional (and advising against the use of DAD) 
on point-to-point links, is in direct conflict with RFC 2462,
which says:

"Duplicate Address Detection MUST take place on all unicast 
addresses, regardless of whether they are obtained through 
stateful, stateless or manual configuration..."

I don't think that we should publish an informational document that 
advises some implementors to do something that specifically
disagrees with a MUST requirement in a standards-track document.
If the standards-track document is broken, we need to fix it 
instead.

[Please note that I actually think that we should be able to 
disable DAD for some link types.  I made a proposal to that effect
several years ago, but my arguments didn't win the day.]

Margaret


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to