> > On this one I think we have made the case very clear > > by talking about _host_ requirements document. The > > router case is important, but left as a future exercise. > > Given that *existing* cell phones already act as (two-port) IP routers, > I don't think it's a good idea to defer that case to the future.
(Are you sure you don't refer to link-layer / bridging capability?) Anyway, we agree on the importance of the router case because at least I personally believe the interesting stuff gets here when we have Personal Area Networks and such. Could do that in a separate document, though, seems there's enough to discuss even if only hosts are mentioned ;-) Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
