"Bound, Jim" wrote: > UNLESS: We go back to what informational means as Charlie and I believe > as it used to be? > > I doubt that is possible.
Well, it's worth a shot, and the draft could include enough text to make it obvious what is meant. That would only make a difference to people who bother to even glance at the document, but anybody implementing the platform would be likely to see it, and any marketing literature would probably not risk the black eye of provably misconstruing the document. Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
