Hello Karim, "Karim El-Malki (ERA)" wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to see some guidelines in an > informational doc. However I disagree on the title change to > IPv6 over cellular/3g. That is a different spec which we should > also work on. It is possible to design "cellular" systems where the 3GPP/PDP address assignment is completely replaced by localized, stateless methods. The way that addresses are assigned is not related to bandwidth, nor even to essential authorization issues. It's an artifact of near-compatibility with existing 2.5G layouts. GGSN does not NECESSARILY need to control this process. Thus, any document which recommends that DAD or Neighbor Discovery might be executed rarely if ever, would not fit such "cellular" systems as I would hope eventually do come about. Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
