Hello Andrew again, > This what is in current 3GPP specifications, is not > necessarily the "right thing".
I think that what is in the 3GPP specs is the problem of 3GPP. Not us. Anyways, I rather would like to think that what 3GPP has is rather good, and (most important of all) it supports IPV6. That's enough for me. Cheers, Jonne. > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Delecki Andrew-Y10658 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:11 PM > To: 'Hesham Soliman (ERA)'; Perkins Charles (IPRG); Karim > El-Malki (ERA) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Should DAD be optional? > [Wasdraft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00. txt -> wg last call?] > Importance: High > > > Dear Hesham, > > This what is in current 3GPP specifications, is not > necessarily the "right thing". > > Recommendation shall include the right network topology and > IPv6 mechanism, not deal with system, which is only "half" right. > > Andrew D. > > Motorola > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hesham Soliman (ERA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:24 PM > To: 'Charles E. Perkins'; Karim El-Malki (ERA) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Should DAD be optional? > [Wasdraft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00. txt -> wg last call?] > > > Hi Charlie > > I finally read the thread. > > > > I agree that it would be good to see some guidelines in an > > > informational doc. However I disagree on the title change to > > > IPv6 over cellular/3g. That is a different spec which we should > > > also work on. > > > > It is possible to design "cellular" systems where the > > 3GPP/PDP address assignment is completely replaced by > > localized, stateless methods. The way that addresses > > are assigned is not related to bandwidth, nor even to > > essential authorization issues. It's an artifact of > > near-compatibility with existing 2.5G layouts. GGSN > > does not NECESSARILY need to control this process. > > > > => That's fine, but we have to deal with what *is* > right now and not what *may come*. > There are people that want to roll out systems with > IPv6 support today, R&D will no doubt improve > things, but in this draft we need to deal with > the current specs. > > > Hesham > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
