Well, I guess that's OK as long as 3GPP are happy referencing an obsolete (and superceded) document. What I mean is, will the reference to the Informational document still make sense when people come to implement this? Will they know where to look for the up-to-date information?
Mat. -----Original Message----- From: john.loughney To: matthew.ford; ipng Sent: 19/03/02 05:46 Subject: RE: IPv6 cellular hosts draft Hi Mat, > There seems to be a lot of overlap between this draft and > both the proposed > IPv6 node requirements draft, and the IPv6 over 3GPP PDP > contexts draft. Is > the working group willing to tolerate this for the sake of > getting something > done in time for the R5 deadline? I'm concerned that this > will result in yet > more confusion for the cellular network community. If we have a node > requirements document and an IPv6 over 3GPP document, what is > the purpose of the cellular hosts document? If at the time that there is a IPv6 over Foo document with RFC status and a IPv6 Node Requirements document that is an RFC, then the information document can be made obsolete. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
