> - router renumbering hasn't been made to work yet, so I doubt that's a
> good option

I agree. Moreover, you can't use it when you assume a site-boundary between
a WAN port and LAN ports of CPE.

> - pppext might be workable for PPP connections, and is a valid mechanism
> especially if there is no simple alternative (e.g. if the only alternative
> is full statefull DHCPv6).

No. PPPext solves the issue only when you use PPP. That means you need
another solution when you don't use PPP, and that makes it difficult to
achieve zero-configuration enviroment.

> - dhcpv6 will work ok, I think, but is a bit complex for being usable
> in every scenario

Yes, that's why Ralf proposed the DHCP subset or DHCP-lite named "DNCP".

> - APD w/ ICMPv6 is ok but can be simplified (e.g. removing prefix return
> message)

I think APD is simple enough, and DNCP is also simple enough. Technically
there is almost no difference between DNCP and APD.

> - RA (Lutchansky) is a nice hack, kinda works with hacking.

It assumes only P-to-P enviroment. Again you need another solution for
non-P-to-P enviroment. Our goal is to achieve auto-configuration, right?
Then, how dose a CPE know whether it is conneted to P-to-P link or P-to-MP
link automatically?

> Note that IMO, configuring these with "stateless DHCPv6" but obtaining the
> prefix with e.g. APD makes perfect sense -- there might be reluctance to
> implement full DHCP, or even the minimal set of "stateful" DHCP.

Both APD and DNCP are "stateful".

I'm providing commercial IPv6 services today, and will start IPv6 over
DSL/FTTH services soon. You should understand that "stateful" is one of the
most important requirements of commercial ISPs.

How do you charge and/or solve abuse problems while you don't know who used
which prefixes and when?



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to