Glenn Morrow wrote:
> I do, however, agree with the forsight that reserving some space in the > identifier now is a good idea; however, there are already bits reserved > in to upper part of the address but these doen't have the same > properties in terms of scoping. Well, if we could agree on the "reservation" at least then we could move rfc 2374 bis forward and continue the "use" discussion. Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
