>>>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 20:48:00 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Actually I can make a compromise with either approach *if we can make
> a quick consensus*. To make the approach I proposed clearer, I've
> attached concrete text for the revised version of IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU
> according to my proposal. If we can live with this (though you may
> prefer the other one), please let us go.
I forgot to mention this:
some parts of the text was derived from the original proposal from
Toerless. Thanks!
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
