> I think that Randy Bush pegged the basic issue back in Salt Lake City:
> there's a basic philosphical disagreement here between viewpoints, one
> of which holds that it's better to use a single generalized
> lightweight config mechanism for all services and the other of which
> holds that it's better to make each config mechanism independent.

credit where due department: i was paraphrasing erik nordmark

but i certainly agree with it.  and i am on the single, simple, general,
motherhood, and mochi side.

randy
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to