I disagree. Hackers who have this level of sophistication can just as easily disrupt DHCP(v4or v6) server traffic, DHCP relay traffic, and/or the traffic to DNS servers that are advertised by the DHCP servers.
Bob At 01:11 AM 4/19/2002, Bill Manning wrote: >% you have almost the same issue which you described above, whether you use >% well-known or non-well-known. >% >% --- Toshi > > Not so. with well-known addresses, the hijack works > every time. if the nameservers (like today) are > different, depending on inital configuration (/etc/resolv.conf) > or passed to the node by a dhcp server, then it is much > harder to hijack every node every time. > > However, I don't wish to impead the progress of this WG. > I'll go back to tending my roses. > >--bill >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
