On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Francis Dupont wrote:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
> 9. Forwarding
> [...]
>
> => this is clear: the next destination must not be outside the source zone.
> I don't believe there is something to discuss for this point.
Perhaps the draft should say it as you did. :-)
> Only the wording is questionable... (i.e. I can't see a concern for
> other thing than the form)
My main gripe was the wording: upon the first look, it was rather
difficult to see what was actually meant.
> ==> Security considerations should mention potential problems of crossing
> zone boundaries w/ routing headers.
>
> => as the rules forbid this there is no need for extra considerations.
This would appear to be in conflict what it says in the draft:
Thus, it is possible, though generally inadvisable, to
use a Routing Header to convey a non-global address across its
associated zone boundary.
or is there some nuance I'm missing?
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
