> At Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:38:35 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > > There are issues raised in solutions like this to insure that the > > co-located services are adequately tied together. For > example in case of a > > "DHCP server in the DNS server" the processes need to be > tied together in a > > manner that the DHCP process would not provide the > address of the DNS > > server if the DNS server process was down. Or that the > DHCP server not > > provide the addresses for other DNS serves unless it > knows that they are up > > and available. > > I suspect that upon close examination all solutions will have issues > along these lines (anycast certainly does).
=> How does anycast have this problem? Specifically, how does the DNS discovery draft have this problem? Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
