I meant to say Mobile Terminals that Support IPv6.  Not Mobile IPv6.....
Just to make that clear.  Two different things. 
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bound, Jim 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Steve Deering
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 1RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements 
> 
> 
> I want to second what Itojun says below.  We cannot assume 
> multicast for immediate deployment beyond the link.  DHCPv6 
> relays will have to be deployed with hard config as they are 
> in DHCPv4 today.  My hope is we do really do Multicast beyond 
> the link with IPv6 but it has not materialized yet even at 
> the bake-offs.
> 
> So saying use MLD is a non-starter from the base premise I 
> support us doing this quickly if we can and that is Mobile 
> Ipv6 Terminals are being deployed like very soon.  As Itojun 
> stated in other mail vendors will be forced to just provide 
> hardcoded addresses or some other such mechanism.
> 
> The projections for roll-out for IPv6 handheld devices in 
> real production in Europe and Asia is as early as Q1 CY 2003. 
>  This is not test bed stuff folks but parts you will be able to buy.
> 
> If we can't meet this deadline (and I don't think we can 
> based on the strong positions on each side) then the vendors 
> will have to develop a solution pretty soon that at least 
> those who care can agree upon to ship IPv6.
> 
> More on this anycast issue later.  Thats a problem too.
> 
> /jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:00 AM
> > To: Steve Deering
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements 
> > 
> > 
> > >(Now that I mention it, perhaps DHCP relays ought also to 
> be replaced
> > >by the use of a well-known, site-local anycast address.)
> > 
> >     question i have is, can we really depend on 
> > availability of multicast
> >     routing infrastructure in a site.  there are lots of 
> > proposals that
> >     assume it, however, implementation status is, i have to 
> > say, rather
> >     poor.
> > 
> > itoun
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to