I agree. Lets begin to work on getting a SHOULD that would fix it completely.
I will follow your lead in the WG so lets do it ............ /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:28 AM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Anycast Addresses being used for Nodes not just Routers > > > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Bound, Jim wrote: > > What do we think we need to do to get the requirement that > only Routers > > can have anycast addresses changed to "nodes". > > > > IETF Work draft-yanjun-lbam-ipv6-00.txt is a good example > of the use of > > anycast for non-router systems that are very important for > the Internet > > and IPv6. > > I've been trying to push the changing of this: > > o An anycast address must not be assigned to an IPv6 host, that > is, it may be assigned to an IPv6 router only. > > in addr-arch-v3-07 to change 'must' to a 'should' for some > time now, with > not much progress. > > I think this is one item that should be changed before > addr-arch is done > with in the IESG and locked for a few years. > > -- > Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, > Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" > Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
