that meant YOu as chair I am saying.........just in case my words were misinterreprted 
as I am busy today sorry.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bound, Jim 
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: Steve Deering
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft
> 
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> As usual we agree at the bottom line.  Good point about the 
> routers not really being src/dst deliberate usually too.  I 
> missed that when typing.
> 
> But as chair I want to say we should ship this spec with the 
> unicast approach as Bob and others have stated.  I know of 3 
> vendors now that are going to ship small devices late 2002 
> and for sure early 2003 and we need this problem fixed.
> 
> OK I will admit I am one of those vendors too so I am biased.
> 
> thanks and again great write up,
> /jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Deering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:11 PM
> > To: Bound, Jim
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft
> > 
> > 
> > At 7:07 PM -0400 5/1/02, Bound, Jim wrote:
> > >Good analysis but something about it don't sit well. My 
> > first response is
> > >that Routers are intermediary nodes and require 
> > configuration too so have
> > >all the properties that come with that flaw.
> > 
> > Jim,
> > 
> > The pedantic answer is no, routers are not necessarily 
> intermediaries
> > according to my definition of that term.  Intermediaries 
> are entities
> > or sets of entities that a seeker sends *to* and/or receives *from*,
> > in order to acquire needed info about a target.  If those 
> entities are
> > not on the same link as the sender, yes, you need routers to enable
> > that sending and/or receiving, but the routers themselves 
> are not the
> > destination or source of the seeker-intermediary 
> communication (unless
> > a router coincidentally happens to be the home of either seeker or
> > intermediary).
> > 
> > The more pragmatic answer is sure, routers are 
> intermediaries.  If you
> > are going to allow seekers and targets to be on different links, you
> > necessarily rely on an intermediary of some sort.  The goal (for
> > robust plug-and-play) is simply to eliminate *unnecessary*
> > intermediaries, because each intermediary is a source of additional
> > potential failures.  For an Internet of more than one link, we
> > obviously need routers to enable communication; the question is
> > whether or not impose a requirement for *more* intermediaries that
> > those.
> > 
> > Note also that routers generally run protocols designed to maximize
> > fault tolerance, by allowing arbitrarily redundant topologies, by
> > not having single points-of-failure, and by ensuring that if 
> > a physical
> > path exists from A to B, then packets can be (best-efforts) 
> delivered
> > from A to B.  That's generally not the case for autoconfiguration
> > servers.
> > 
> > >...my domain required management to be set up the way I personally
> > >want it to be set up not the way the canned techno parts came to me
> > >via UPS.
> > 
> > Fine, the IPv6 stateful autoconf option is there for those who want
> > to do that.  But my neighbor *does* want it to just work out-of-
> > the-UPS-box, and I want IPv6 to be reliably usable by all my 
> > neighbors,
> > not just the ones who are geeks.  (Well, here in Silicon 
> Valley, it's
> > probably the case that all my neighbors are geeks, but you know what
> > I mean... :-)
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to