>>All,
>> Just to give everyone the ability to review the draft, here is
>>the announcement of the draft outlining changes to MLD to support
>>hosts announcing their membership in anycast groups. Ideally, these
>>changes will get incorporated into the MLDv2 spec at some point.
> i believe we don't have consensus on how we should deal with anycast
> route injection. there are at least several ways. my preference is
> with the first option below. as anycast address is being be treated
> in similar ways as unicast address, i think it most natural option.
it also is consistent with currently-practiced IPv4 anycast (or,
unicast address assigned to multiple nodes), like those documented in
draft-ietf-dnsop-*-shared-root-server*.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
