In your previous mail you wrote: On a given IPv6 Interface on a router, I understand that it is allowed to configure a global unicast address with an Interface_ID which is *different* from the Interface_ID of the Link Local Address. - is this something that should be discouraged or instead - can this be considered as normal practice e.g. for operator convenience ? => IMHO the second and if the software complains it should give a way to setup the interface ID before to create the link-local address.
Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: I deeply dislike the uncontrolled autoconfiguration of a link-local address to every interfaces a la KAME. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
