I assume, this discussion is in relation to the draft? I'm updating the text right now, so please let me know what you want to add. Specifically any ill-advice that the draft is giving to implementers.
Hesham > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:59 PM > To: Allison Mankin > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "IPv6 for Some Second and Third > Gener ation Cellular Hosts" > > > > How about if we find ways to say: IETF does not see the need to > > encode these practices, for whatever access technology, in RFCs? > ^ ^ > | | > | `-- ill-advised > | > `-- or assist in any way > > randy, channeling keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
