> >There is a basic problem with having this document specify any sort of >required behavior with respect to MIPv6. There is no RFC today for >MIPv6 (we are getting close, but we are not quite there yet).
Okay. I agree, then, that we shouldn't specify any MIP behaviour in this document. I was under the (apparently mistaken) impression that we were further along on MIPv6 than this... Thanks, Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
