In your previous mail you wrote: I disagree. I think the problem is in the RFC 2462 optimization. The RFC 2462 optimization also can fail with manually-configured addresses - it's not just a problem with RFC 3041 temporary addresses. => I agree: the RFC 2462 optimization is based on many implicit assumptions... We have to drop it or to respecify it clearly/cleanly.
I'm curious about the implementation status. I know the Windows implementation does not implement the RFC 2462 optimization - it performs DAD on every address independently. What about other implementations? => in my implementation, DAD was done on every address with an user control to disable it (default was to enable DAD) but the autoconfig client tool didn't perform DAD (it was considered as a bug). Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
