I've been thinking about the DNS discovery, as well as the larger 
"service discovery with no 3rd party dependencies" issue, for a while.

Just like Steve Deering and many others I'd like the IETF to explore 
the larger issue, since I'm very much interested in making the future
Internet more robust than what we have today.
But this effort needs to be done carefully to make sure that we
are solving a well-defined and well-constrained problem. Thus I think
it would make sense to hold a BoF on this topic (perhaps in Yokohama
if there are folks willing to work on putting such a BoF together
in the very short time that remains).

Level 1 of the current DNS discovery draft is likely to set a precedent 
that well-known unicast addresses will be allocated for services.
The IETF has never done that before - we've only allocated well-known 
*multicast* addresses for services.
Going down the path of allocating well-known unicast addresses,
even if they are site-local addresses, is something I would be
very uncomfortable doing, especially if it is done as a "quick fix"
for a short-term DNS discovery solution without knowing what a potential
future "service discovery with no 3rd party dependencies" scheme might
look like. This concern appears to be shared by some other IESG members
based on some discussions last week.

These concerns would probably be less strong if the fixed unicast 
address was one part of a larger architecture, in which the reservation 
of fixed address was limited and necessary as part of an overall solution. 
Instead, it appears that this particular choice is being driven by a 
particular short-term problem with no apparent relationship to future and 
more general work.


So if I was an implementor that wanted a DNS discovery solution as
soon as possible, I'd just go with DHCPv6 information-request for now,
while participating in the larger, and necessarily longer term, discussions
about "service discovery with no 3rd party dependencies".

Comments?
   Erik



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to