In your previous mail you wrote: >> But as site is rather vaguely defined, I think many vendors just skip >> this little detail.. > I disagree: we have a similar but more complex issue for multicast > forwarding and the zone boundary check is very easy to implement cool. how do you detect that you are at the edge of a site? => no detection but static configuration... Technically this is easy to implement, of course the question whether this is easy to manage is very different (BTW I am on the "site-local == private for never connected sites" side from the beginning).
Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: IMHO to reopen the site-local addressing question for the third time (at least) is a good idea *only* if we have a reasonable chance to reach a consensus. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
