> kre wrote: > There is way too much of the latter in all areas of the IETF these > days. I don't know the answer to this today, so I will forbid it > forever.
Yep. I will write a requirements draft that is impossible to meet so it will be forbidden for ever. > SL addresses are just fine. More work is needed on them for sure, > to make them even more useful, and suggesting to people that until > the implementations better support them, they should consider very > carefully before enabling the things, is all just fine. But > there's no reason at all to be even considering deleting them. I agree. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
