Hi Alberto, I understand but that is not a valid logic argument to cause us to break many things in our boxes that is coming out now. I also think as Jinmei stated it is not a per application issue but per user issue. That means it cannot be a default from my view.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Alberto Escudero-Pascual [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:45 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Erik Nordmark; Keith Moore; Thomas Narten; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IESG comments on > draft-ietf-ipngwg-default-addr-select-06.txt > > > > Hi Jim! > > If only the users that have concerns about privacy will end > up using temp > addresses (RFC3041) we will end up with a minority group of > techno-geeks > or as you call us 'paranoids' highly observable and easy to > identify from > the crowd. > > I firmly beleive that RFC3041 should be the default option > and only the > nodes that require a fixed address should enable that option. > 'Privacy' > should be the default option. I don't want to be sorrounded > by boxes with > EUI-64 based addresses and be myself the only one running RFC3041. > > /aep > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
