> JJ Behrens wrote: > [Michel's point about SLs being somehow more secure] > Your point is valid. Now it remains to be argued whether the > difficulties associated with SL's are worth this small increase > in security. Personally, I feel that this small increase in > security is not worth the extra work. However, it remains to be > seen whether we can solve the renumbering problem (i.e. the use > of SL's for longterm stable IP's).
A matter of appreciation, indeed. But there is some demand for SLs. So, what about comparing the extra work required to make SLs work to the work required to suppress them, plus the work required to deal with whatever (possibly more crappy) will replace them? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
