Hi
Adam,
I
agree. We are planning on doing that (I thought I put a placeholder in the
doc for this). I actually wanted to add this after we get some feedback on
the draft, just to ease document editing.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Adam Machalek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June, 2002 22:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-00.txt
My first comment is structural in nature. Six months ago when we started our IPv6 implementation I spent several weeks wading through all the IPv6 and NGTrans RFCs and drafts in order to catagorize them into what this draft terms "unconditional manditory", "conditional mandatory", and "unconditionally optional". From there we were able to focus our effort.
While it is clearly defined in the text of the draft, I would have appreciated an Appendix with nothing more then a list of the relevent RFCs/Drafts grouped into those 3 catagories.
Adam Machalek
