Keith Moore wrote: > > > I agree 100% with Micehls' point - assigning unique IDs to sites for use in > > site-local addresses moves the site-local addresses into a globally > > routable address space, with the additional feature that those addresses > > are provider independent. The result would be an address space that is > > site-local by (potentially unenforceable) executive fiat rather than by > > technical design. > > this sounds like a feature to me, because it would allow hosts using > such addresses to have their traffic routed between sites without NAT.
Not in the real world; these addresses wouldn't be routable because they won't aggregate. > > private addresses were a bad idea; we should not repeat them in v6. Indeed. That's not what SL addresses are, fortunately. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
