Keith,

> I don't agree that the Default Address Selection document should
> be published without change, and I don't think we have consensus on
> that at all.  though perhaps the sections on SL are okay.
> (not sure what you meant here by "no change")

Could you please be clear on what you mean above? A revised version of
draft-ietf-ipv6-default-addr-select-08.txt was submitted last week
with a note summarizing changes to the list. If you (or anyone) has
issues with that document, please be specific about what wording you
disagree with and how you think it needs changing. 

Thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to