On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Alain Durand wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 11:38 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
> > The IESG has reviewed this document and has a number of concerns.
> >
> >
> > The IESG believes that the name space as provided by the DNS should
> > not be mixed or "contaminated" with name resolutions performed using
> > the ICMP mechanism. Doing so raises complex security and trust issues
> > that have not been explored.
> >
> > The document should make it clear that name lookups using the icmp
> > mechanism described in this document are never to be mixed with DNS
> > name lookups. That is, no queries made to the DNS (or implicitely
> > assumed to be going to the DNS) should get back responses that have
> > been learned through the ICMP name lookup mechanism.
> 
> I do not understand this comment.
> Vendors have long learned how to integrate different name services:
> DNS, NIS, NIS+, LDAP, Flat files....

These services have some reasonable security models ..

> ICMP NI would just be one more service to integrate.

.. this has not.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to