Francis,
I agree that prefix delegation is important for the home sites.
Unfortunately, I will not be at IETF 54 to discuss my prefix delegation
work. If it becomes an agenda item, I will see about getting someone
to participate for me.
Regards,
Brian
Francis Dupont wrote:
>
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
> => Francis Dupont wrote:
> => I strongly encourage items about prefix delegation for
> => home sites because these are *urgent* for IPv6 deployment.
>
> I must have missed something. Can you develop this / post links?
>
> => today ISP which manages an IPv6 dialup service (i.e., its customers
> run "home sites") should allocate a /48 per connection but there is
> no available protocol to do this. It seems the only way is static
> delegation/configuration and this is very heavy and not scalable at all.
> So if you believe the "home site" case is important for IPv6 deployment,
> we have to solve many problems and the prefix delegation is the first one
> (and as this is a problem for both the ISP and its customers, its value/cost
> doubles :-).
>
> Regards
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
