> have you read the latest MIPv6 spec?
I have, in fact read the spec.
> there is an explicit code in the Binding Ack which says "Route
> Optimization unnecessary due to low traffic". the CN just has to
> refuse the binding with this code.
So, existing nodes will reportedly refuse the binding with an "icmp
parameter problem" message. Why do we need a second encoding for the
same message? Isn't it better to just have one encoding?
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
