> chairs,
> i would like to get some guidance on how to proceed with my document
> draft-itojun-ipv6-nodeinfo-revlookup-00.txt. i would like to publish
> it as an informational/experimental RFC. which wg is appropriate,
> or should i pursue it as individual submission?
>
> i understand pushbacks against icmpv6 node information query
> (which should be addressed separately), and against non-DNS name
> mapping in general.
just to make sure - i don't mean to replace PTR with it, it can be
used together with PTR. it is an interesting situation if you get
answer from both, but anyway...
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
